🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a increasing number of countries are exploring parallel bans.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". A law may be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on the legislature to approve a bill raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related move, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has urged families to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a advisory motion calling for a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is provided. Even though it highlights of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a solid foundation," commented one European lawmaker driving the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Previously, interest gathered behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the government vowed to investigate the matter.

Charities have expressed concerns. An organization established by the relatives of a girl who was lost after being exposed to harmful online content argues that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the social media companies to create tools that are appropriate and fit for children," said a leading peer.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, legislation is primarily unfolding at the state government level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a law barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with additional access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced measures demanding adult authorization for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from certain figures to copy the Australian example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Views

Apart from the West, other countries are also taking action.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies take a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

As this worldwide debate continues, the actions of Australia and several other countries show that policymakers internationally are increasingly prepared to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.